CIBATH Biofilter
PlanningDIY biofilter to remove micro- and nanoplastics from tap water using biological filtration media.
Overview
A DIY biofilter designed to remove micro- and nanoplastics from tap water using biological filtration media — a practical, home-scale approach to a growing environmental health concern.
Problem
Micro- and nanoplastics are present in tap water worldwide. Commercial filters aren’t designed to target particles at the nanoscale. There’s no affordable, accessible home solution.
Approach
- Design a gravity-fed or low-pressure biofilter using layered biological media
- Biofilms on sand/gravel media act as “irreversible traps” for nanoplastics
- Test before/after water quality (within the limits of home testing)
- Iterate on media types and flow rates
Open Questions
- What filter media candidates for v1? (Sand, activated carbon, biochar?)
- What “success” measurement is feasible at home?
- Flow rate vs. filtration efficiency tradeoff
- Maintenance schedule — how often to clean/replace media?
- Safety — is the filtered water safe to drink, or demonstration-only?
Research Plan
Research Question
Can a gravity-fed layered biofilter using sand, gravel, and biochar achieve measurable reduction in micro- and nanoplastic concentrations in Swiss tap water at the home scale?
Milestone 1 — Literature Review & Hypothesis
Goal: Formalize existing research into a structured review, define the experimental plan.
- Synthesize research notes into a proper literature review covering:
- Nanoplastic composition and behavior in tap water
- Biological filtration mechanisms (biofilm adhesion, enzymatic degradation)
- Existing pilot projects (BIOFOS Copenhagen, Eawag Switzerland)
- Define a testable hypothesis and scope (what the filter targets, what it doesn’t)
- Identify measurement strategy:
- Home instruments: turbidity meter, TDS meter, particle counter
- Professional: contact Eawag or a local Swiss lab for before/after water sample analysis
- Be explicit about what home measurements can and cannot prove
- Write up experimental methodology (media selection rationale, test protocol, data collection plan)
Publish: Blog post — open lab notebook with literature review, hypothesis, and experimental plan Video: “I’m building a biofilter to remove nanoplastics — here’s what the science says”
Milestone 2 — Filter Design & Build (v1)
Goal: First working prototype.
- Select and justify media stack from literature (sand, gravel, activated carbon, biochar)
- Design housing: gravity-fed, food-safe container, 3D-printed manifolds for inlet/outlet
- Document full BOM, CAD files, assembly process
- Begin biofilm conditioning (weeks of flowing water to establish biological layer)
- Log conditioning progress (visual changes, flow rate over time)
Publish: Open design files (CAD, BOM, assembly guide) on GitHub Video: “Building the biofilter v1” — design decisions, science behind each media layer, biofilm timelapse
Milestone 3 — Baseline Testing
Goal: Establish what the filter measurably does.
- Run before/after measurements over several weeks as biofilm matures:
- Turbidity (NTU)
- Total dissolved solids (ppm)
- Flow rate (mL/min)
- pH, temperature
- Send paired water samples (unfiltered + filtered) to a professional lab for particle analysis
- Budget for 2-3 lab tests across the project lifecycle
- Log all data systematically (timestamped, raw values, conditions)
- Be transparent: state clearly what home instruments measure vs. what they don’t
Publish: Raw data on GitHub, blog post with methodology and initial results Video: “Does the biofilter actually work?” — testing process, explaining what each measurement means, honest about limitations
Milestone 4 — Iteration & Optimization
Goal: Improve filtration performance based on data.
- Build a second filter to enable A/B testing
- Vary one parameter at a time:
- Media composition and layer depth
- Flow rate (adjust head height)
- Biofilm maturity (age of filter)
- Track maintenance: clogging rates, backwash frequency, media replacement intervals
- Document failure modes (channeling, biological contamination, flow bypass)
- Send second round of lab samples after optimization
Publish: Updated dataset, iteration log with before/after comparisons Video: “What went wrong and what I changed” — real engineering iteration, failure modes, improvements
Milestone 5 — Formal Write-Up & Publication
Goal: Compile findings into a publishable paper.
- Structure: introduction, methods, results, discussion, limitations, conclusion
- Frame the contribution as citizen science methodology for home-scale water filtration assessment
- Preprint first on Zenodo or OSF (gets a DOI immediately)
- Target journals:
- Citizen Science: Theory and Practice
- PLoS ONE
- JOSS (if significant software/tooling is produced)
- Include all raw data and design files as supplementary material
Publish: Preprint → journal submission Video: “I published a research paper on my DIY biofilter” — the story of doing independent research, the process, what was learned
Notes
- Timeline estimate: ~12 months total alongside other projects. M1-M2: ~2-3 months. M3: ~2 months (data collection takes time). M4: ~3 months. M5: ~2 months.
- Key credibility move: Professional lab analysis. Even 1-2 tests bridge the gap between home-instrument proxies and real nanoplastic measurement.
- Eawag connection: They are doing exactly this research in Switzerland. A cold email explaining the citizen science angle may open doors for collaboration, equipment access, or at minimum guidance on measurement methodology.
- Videos are not a separate track. The camera rolls during the research. Each milestone naturally produces both a publication artifact and video content.
- Safety: Until professional lab results confirm safety, all filtered water is for demonstration and measurement only — not drinking.